Invitation fra Det Etiske Råd til "Debatarrangement: Hvor langt bør myndighederne gå for at fremme borgernes sundhedstilstand" den 13. januar 2016

Til alle interesserede
Hvor langt bør myndighederne gå for at fremme borgernes sundhedstilstand?
Det Etiske Råd afholder den 13. januar et debatarrangement med en af opfinderne af begrebet nudging,
tidligere rådgiver for præsident Barack Obama Cass Sunstein, Harvard University.
Find vedlagt en invitation til debatarrangementet samt tilmeldingsdetaljer.
Send meget gerne denne invitation videre til andre interesserede. Tilmelding så længe pladser haves.
Baggrund
Stat, regioner og kommuner spiller alle en aktiv rolle i at påvirke danskernes sundhedsadfærd. Til fordel for
både samfund og borgere.
For tiden debatteres det dog, om det er blevet svært at være usund i Danmark som følge af det markante
sundhedsfokus. Sundhedskampagner kritiseres for at skade de svageste borgere mere end det gavner dem.
Også på en række andre områder er myndighedernes sundhedsfremmearbejde til diskussion og mødes af
nogle med direkte skepsis, fx kræftscreeningprogrammer og HPV- og mæslingevaccinationsprogrammer.
Brugen af prædiktive undersøgelser til at forebygge sygdom kan i fremtiden komme i fokus, når danskerne i
sammenhæng med Danske Regioners projekt Personlig Medicin får kortlagt deres genom.
Det Etiske Råd vil frem imod sommeren 2016 indsamle viden og erfaringer som baggrund for sit arbejde
med myndighedernes kommunikation på forebyggelses- og sundhedsfremmeområdet.
Med venlig hilsen
Ebba Johnsen
Sekretær
Fællessekretariatet
Det Etiske Råd og
Den Nationale Videnskabsetiske Komité
Holbergsgade 6
1057 København K
T: +45 72269376
ebj@dketik.dk
www.etiskraad.dk
www.dnvk.dk
Udvalget vedrørende Det Etiske Råd 2015-16
UER Alm.del Bilag 2
Offentligt


Health nudges in the welfare state
– potentials and limits?
Presentation and debate with Harvard Law Professor Cass R. Sunstein about
the legitimacy of public health communication strategies in welfare states.
January 13, 15.00-17.00
Venue: Aalborg University, Copenhagen
A.C. Meyers Vænge 15
Auditorium 1.008
Programme:
15.00 - 15.15 : Introduction and welcome
15.15 - 16.00 : Presentation by Prof. Cass R. Sunstein
16.00- 17.00 : Debate – questions from the panel and audience to Prof. Cass Sunstein
Moderator: Thomas Ploug, professor, member of The Danish Council of Ethics
Panel: To be announced
Professor Cass R. Sunstein is the acclaimed author with behavioural economist
Richard Thaler of the book Nudge - Improving Decisions About Health,
Wealth and Happiness where they coin the concept of nudging. Nudges are
attempts to shape individuals’ context of choice with foreseeable effects on
the individual’s behavior while at the same time preserving that individual’s
freedom of choice. In the health area this popular but also contested idea
translates to the notion that authorities may mildly “nudge” citizens in a more healthy
direction without infringing their personal freedom.
Cass Sunstein has advised President Barack Obama whereas Richard Thaler has been
involved in the development of UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s “nudge unit”.
Different cases will be the turning point of the debate, see page 2.
Participation free of charge. Sign up as long as vacant seats remain by sending
name, place of work and email to Ebba Johnsen at ebj@dketik.dk
Arranged by The Danish Council of Ethics
in cooperation with:
C E N T R E F O R A P P L I E D E T H I C S
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Udvalget vedrørende Det Etiske Råd 2015-16
UER Alm.del Bilag 2
Offentligt
Cases for debate
Default screening programs
One example of nudging is the use of default models. For instance, in Denmark, 50-74 year old
citizens are by default enrolled to participate in colorectal cancer screening programs, even
though it is not obvious that the benefits of participation outweigh the costs to everyone.
Citizens are free to decline, but it is well known from nudging studies that default models tend
to be “sticky” – often, participation in default models happens without reflection. One reason
could be that people have great faith in the beneficial nature of what is recommended by the
authorities. In Denmark, the citizens’ trust in the authorities is often described as unusually
high. But given this trust, and given the ambiguity about the benefit of participating, ought the
Danish authorities not to be particularly hesitant about employing communication strategies
with nudging effects?
Health prevention campaigns
When it comes to exercise, smoking or the consumption of alcohol, the evidence of harm and
benefit is clear. The Danish population is following the international strong upwards trend
concerning obesity with profound negative effects in terms of personal and societal costs and
quality of life. But for various reasons, politicians in Denmark and elsewhere are hesitant about
introducing hard legislation – or even nudging – as a means of addressing obesity problems.
However, various other strategies are employed in Denmark, including nation-wide informa-
tion campaigns and prevention programs often targeting groups with low average health, in the
name of equality. Critics, however, point out that these campaigns are inefficient; that
moralizing from the “health mafia” has gone too far; and that precisely these groups are
harmed more than benefited because they lack the will and resources to change their life style,
not the knowledge. Instead, some suggest, one ought to nudge people. Is “benign manipula-
tion” the way forward for prevention in egalitarian societies?
Vaccination
To ensure group immunity, there is a strong societal interest in achieving a high rate of
vaccination. Because of frequent suspicions about side effects, however, many are hesitant
about enrolling themselves or their children in national vaccination programmes. This increases
the risk of outbreaks of diseases like measles and cancers caused by viruses. Ought the
authorities to push harder to persuade everybody to participate – and using what means?
Genetic risk information
A revolution in the area of genetic analysis means that also people with no known hereditary
condition may now have their genes analyzed for a mapping of genetically based sensitivities
related to e.g. cancers, diabetes or heart disease. Thus, such data may encourage people to
pursue healthier life styles. The data, however, is very uncertain and may lead to unfounded
concern or a false sense of safety. Should the use of predictive testing nonetheless be
encouraged as a way of nudging people to live more healthy lives?