Orientering om Regeringens høringssvar på Kommissionens høring "Sustainable Transport Investment Plan", fra erhvervsministeren

Tilhører sager:

Aktører:


    Oversendelsesbrev til ERU.docx

    https://www.ft.dk/samling/20241/almdel/eru/bilag/307/3065011.pdf

    ERHVERVSMINISTEREN
    8. september 2025
    ERHVERVSMINISTERIET
    Slotsholmsgade 10-12
    1216 København K
    Tlf. 33 92 33 50
    Fax. 33 12 37 78
    CVR-nr. 10092485
    EAN nr. 5798000026001
    em@em.dk
    www.em.dk
    OFFENTLIG
    Folketingets Erhvervsudvalg
    Vedlagt fremsender jeg til udvalgets orientering regeringshøringssvar samt
    et orienteringsnotat vedrørende Kommissionens offentlige høring om inve-
    steringsplan for bæredygtig transport.
    Med venlig hilsen
    Morten Bødskov
    Offentligt
    ERU Alm.del - Bilag 307
    Erhvervsudvalget 2024-25
    

    Høringssvar.docx

    https://www.ft.dk/samling/20241/almdel/eru/bilag/307/3065012.pdf

    OFFENTLIG
    3 September 2025
    Response of the Danish Government to the
    Commission’s call for evidence - Sustainable
    Transport Investment Plan (STIP)
    Introduction
    On 7 August 2025, the Commission initiated a call for evidence to
    gather input for an upcoming Sustainable Transport Investment
    Plan (STIP). The purpose of the plan is to provide a strategic
    framework for the green transition of all modes of transport focus-
    ing specifically on the aviation and maritime sectors.
    For road transport, electrification with battery electric vehicles is
    well under way due to technological advancement and supported
    especially by the CO2-standards for light and heavy-duty vehicles
    as well as Member States’ initiatives. However, especially in avia-
    tion and maritime transport, direct electrification with the current
    technological readiness level is in many cases unable to meet the
    high energy density requirements. Instead, renewable and low car-
    bon fuels are needed and it is important that the production and
    uptake of these fuels is ramped up quickly, globally and in the EU.
    The production and availability of green fuels in the EU is not only
    important to deliver on the EU’s climate ambitions, it can also help
    reduce air pollution if taking into consideration in the development
    of the fuels. In addition, production of renewable and low carbon
    fuels improves the EU’s energy security.
    The Danish Government agrees with the Commission that a guid-
    ing framework on how to support the production of renewable and
    low carbon fuels for the aviation and maritime sectors is indeed
    necessary and helpful in furthering and accelerating the transition.
    Such a framework can address distinct investment barriers associ-
    ated with each mode of transport and also increase the competi-
    Offentligt
    ERU Alm.del - Bilag 307
    Erhvervsudvalget 2024-25
    Page 2/4
    OFFENTLIG
    tiveness of the clean tech manufacturing sector in line with the rec-
    ommendations of the Draghi-report. Currently, we see e-fuel man-
    ufacturing projects being delayed or not reaching final investment
    decision. This has mainly been due to the inability of these projects
    to secure financing due to high perceived risk of investment in e-
    fuel manufacturing. This is despite of the ReFuelEU Aviation and
    FuelEU Maritime regulations requiring the use of e-fuels already
    from 2030.
    However, dynamics in the fuel market and policy uncertainty in-
    creases the perceived risk of investing. Producers of e-fuels need
    offtake agreement for 10 to 15 years in order to obtain financing.
    Airlines and ship owners on the other hand operate on so thin mar-
    gins that they cannot risk locking in a higher price on e-fuels than
    their competitors for 10 years and are therefore only willing to en-
    gage in short offtake agreements.
    In addition, market participants rely on the stability of the man-
    dates in the ReFuelEU Aviation and FuelEU Maritime regulations.
    If the market doubts whether the mandates will remain or if fines
    will not be imposed as stipulated in the regulations, then invest-
    ment in e-fuels manufacturing becomes even more risky. There-
    fore, new mechanisms are needed to initiate the market for pro-
    duction of green fuels as the pricing challenge seems unlikely to be
    solved by market power alone.
    Reiterate and reduce uncertainty in existing regulation
    The Danish Government encourages the Commission to reiterate
    its commitment to the existing mandates in the ReFuelEU Aviation
    and FuelEU Maritime regulation. Together with a guiding frame-
    work of de-risking investment in production of renewable and low
    carbon fuels this could bolster market trust and incentivise more
    investment in these types of fuels.
    Unfortunately, there has been uncertainty regarding the right of
    Member States to introduce national mandates for the aviation
    sector when transposing the revised Renewable Energy Directive
    (III). This has resulted in a heterogeneous landscape of aviation
    mandates across the EU. Denmark therefore encourages the Com-
    mission to provide clear and consistent guidance on the extent to
    which Member States may introduce mandates and support the
    uptake of sustainable fuels in the aviation sector. In general, Den-
    mark advocates for a uniform and simple regulatory landscape
    across sectors.
    Page 3/4
    OFFENTLIG
    The Danish Government suggests that the Commission ensures co-
    herence between EU regulation and future international measures,
    including a potential fuel standard adopted at the International
    Maritime Organisation (IMO). It should also address the interac-
    tion between EU regulation, including FuelEU Maritime and the
    EU ETS, and the potential fuel standard under IMO.
    Introduce de-risking mechanisms
    The Danish Government agrees with the Commission that de-risk-
    ing investments in renewable and low carbon fuels manufacturing
    is the appropriate tool. Neither the EU-budget nor the Member
    States can accomplish the task of bridging the entire cost difference
    between fossil fuels and green fuels, which alone for e-SAF could
    reach several billion euro per year. Private capital needs to be mo-
    bilised and the transitions ought in general to be driven by the
    market and privately financed.
    The role of policy is thus to create a framework where the risk of
    investment in production facilities is as low as possible. The Dan-
    ish Government welcomes the Commission’s focus on different
    mechanisms that can reduce the risk, such as, but not limited to,
    double-sided auctions or contract for difference. Financing new
    initiatives will be difficult and we therefore support the Commis-
    sion’s effort to analyse how current funding mechanisms can be
    used.
    Continue the work on simplifying the state-aid rules
    In assessing novel policy mechanisms, if these are to be imple-
    mented by the Member States it is important to give the Member
    States, the best and most simple possible tools to do so. This in-
    volves making sure the state aid rules allow for speedy approval of
    these new policy mechanisms. We therefore support the Commis-
    sion’s ongoing work to simplify and clarify the state aid rules, for
    example with the newly adopted CISAF, and the focus in this
    framework on de-risking private investments related to clean in-
    dustrial deal objectives. This work on simplification could also look
    into whether support for renewable and low carbon fuels and/or
    battery electric or hydrogen powered aviation could usefully be in-
    cluded in the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), mak-
    ing state aid tools easier to implement.
    It is also important that the new policy tools are aligned with other
    regulations in this field. For example, Denmark has, to date, been
    unable to obtain a clear answer from the Commission on whether
    e-SAF subject to state aid can count towards the mandates set out
    in ReFuelEU Aviation. Such uncertainty regarding state aid rules
    Page 4/4
    OFFENTLIG
    hinders the ability of Member States to efficiently support the scal-
    ing up of domestic e-SAF production.
    Coordination is important
    The Danish Government recognizes that a coordinated EU effort is
    beneficial. The aviation and maritime sectors are by default inter-
    national. A coordinated framework in the EU for supporting re-
    newable and low carbon fuels can help secure alignment with the
    mandates of the ReFuelEU Aviation and FuelEU Maritime regula-
    tions as well as limit the fragmentation of regulatory requirements
    that investors need to comply with in different Member States.
    The Danish Government thanks the Commission for the oppor-
    tunity to contribute input and looks forward to assessing the solu-
    tions outlined in the Sustainable Transport Investment Plan.
    

    Orienterende notat.docx

    https://www.ft.dk/samling/20241/almdel/eru/bilag/307/3065013.pdf

    OFFENTLIG
    NOTAT
    3. September 2025
    Regeringens høringssvar på Kommissionens
    høring ”Sustainable Transport Investment
    Plan”
    Kommissionen har den 7. august 2025 iværksat en offentlig høring
    vedrørende en kommende investeringsplan for bæredygtig trans-
    port – Sustainable Transport Investment Plan (STIP) – hvortil re-
    geringen har udarbejdet et høringssvar. Initiativet vil være en ikke-
    lovgivningsmæssig politisk meddelelse.
    I høringssvaret billiger regeringen Kommissionens fokus på at faci-
    litere produktionen af grønne brændstoffer navnlig til luft- og sø-
    fart. Regeringen er enig med Kommissionen i, at særlige udfordrin-
    ger gør sig gældende ved omstillingen af luft- og skibsfart.
    Der er for mange projekter vedrørende produktionsfaciliteter til
    bæredygtige brændstoffer, der løber ud i sandet, fordi finansie-
    ringshindringer og risikofaktorer fører til, at initiativtagerne ikke
    træffer endelige investeringsbeslutninger. Regeringen mener der-
    for, at Kommissionens investeringsplan for bæredygtig transport
    bør:
    • Gøre det klart, at ambitionerne med eksisterende lovgiv-
    ning i form af ReFuelEU Aviation og FuelEU Maritime ikke
    ændres.
    • Adressere samspil mellem EU-regulering, herunder Fue-
    lEU Maritime og EU ETS med den kommende klimaregule-
    ring af skibsfarten indført i regi af FN’s Søfartsorganisation
    (IMO).
    • Skabe en ramme, der reducerer investeringsrisikoen for
    markedsaktørerne, og derfor rejser kapital fra markedsak-
    tører.
    • Undersøge, om statsstøttereglerne egner sig til, at med-
    lemsstaterne kan understøtte produktionen af grønne
    brændstoffer.
    Kommissionens oplyser, at meddelelsen præsenteres i tredje kvar-
    tal 2025.
    Offentligt
    ERU Alm.del - Bilag 307
    Erhvervsudvalget 2024-25