Forslag til RÅDETS HENSTILLING om en koordineret tilgang til overgangen fra midlertidig beskyttelse for fordrevne personer fra Ukraine

Tilhører sager:

Aktører:


    1_EN_ACT_part1_v6.pdf

    https://www.ft.dk/samling/20251/kommissionsforslag/kom(2025)0651/forslag/2146582/3035209.pdf

    EN EN
    EUROPEAN
    COMMISSION
    Brussels, 4.6.2025
    COM(2025) 651 final
    2025/0651 (NLE)
    Proposal for a
    COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
    on a coordinated approach to the transition out of temporary protection for displaced
    persons from Ukraine
    Offentligt
    KOM (2025) 0651 - Henstilling
    Europaudvalget 2025
    EN 1 EN
    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
    1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
    • Reasons for and objectives of the proposal
    On 4 March 2022, the Council adopted implementing Decision 2022/382 and activated
    Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 (the ‘Temporary Protection Directive’) for
    certain categories of people displaced on or after 24 February 2022, as a result of the military
    invasion of Ukraine by Russian armed forces that began on that date. Pursuant to Article 4(1)
    of the Temporary Protection Directive, temporary protection was first applied for an initial
    period of 1 year, until 4 March 2023, and was then automatically extended for one additional
    year until 4 March 2024.
    Since that date, the duration of temporary protection has been further extended twice. On 19
    October 2023, the Council adopted Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2409 extending
    temporary protection until 4 March 2025. On 25 June 2024, the Council adopted
    Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/1836 extending temporary protection for a further period
    of one year, until 4 March 2026.
    The Temporary Protection Directive continues to provide a sound legal framework for
    ensuring the same, harmonised standards of protection for millions of people fleeing the war
    in Ukraine to the EU. As the reasons for temporary protection persist, due to the ongoing
    volatile situation in Ukraine that does not yet allow to conclude that there are safe and durable
    conditions for return as well as the ongoing uncertainty on how the situation in the country
    will evolve, the Commission is presenting this proposal for a Council Recommendation
    alongside the proposal to extend temporary protection for a further year, until 4 March 2027.
    Temporary protection is by its nature temporary. At some future point in time, when the
    circumstances change to allow for sufficient certainty about the situation in Ukraine, and in
    particular the conclusion that safe and durable conditions for return would exist, temporary
    protection will need to come to an end. It is necessary to be ready for this change when that
    time comes. Therefore, it is important to pave the way for a smooth and well-coordinated
    transition out of temporary protection that will cater for the needs of those residing in the EU,
    while taking into account the capacity and reconstruction needs of Ukraine.
    Inherent to the definition of temporary protection is also the need to avoid risks to the
    Member States’ national asylum systems which would otherwise be unable to process large
    number of applications for international protection without undermining their efficient
    operation. This consideration is of key importance when mapping the transition out of
    temporary protection to ensure that a future ending of temporary protection avoids adverse
    impacts on national asylum systems.
    The EU needs a common approach for the future. Our approach must balance the interests of
    Member States, of the people who sought refuge in the EU, and of Ukraine, while offering
    predictability, stability and a more balanced impact across Member States. A common
    European approach also allows us to fully consider the views of the Ukrainian government
    and the country’s reconstruction needs.
    In this context, the Commission proposes a set of coordinated measures to transition from
    temporary protection to other legal statuses, as well as to support people who wish to go home
    when the situation allows. Knowing what will happen when temporary protection ends,
    EN 2 EN
    providing possibilities for continuing legal residence in the EU as well as possibilities to go
    back home would allow persons enjoying temporary protection to make informed choices
    about their future, while ensuring legal certainty on their status.
    Based on these considerations, the Commission proposes that the Council Recommendation
    focuses on four sets of measures to:
    (1) promote and facilitate the transition to other legal statuses already before the
    end of temporary protection;
    (2) pave the way for a smooth and sustainable reintegration in Ukraine;
    (3) ensure information provision to displaced persons; and
    (4) ensure coordination, monitoring and exchange of information among Member
    States and with the Ukrainian authorities.
    Measures to promote and facilitate the transition to other legal statuses already before
    the end of temporary protection
    Temporary protection was initially activated to provide immediate relief to individuals fleeing
    Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, ensuring that the Member States’ asylum systems
    would not be overwhelmed by a large number of applications for international protection, and
    preventing the risk that Member States would be unable to process applications without
    adverse effects on their efficient operation, in the interest of the persons requesting protection.
    Many displaced persons who have benefitted from temporary protection have now been in the
    EU for several years, and have integrated into their host societies by learning the language,
    finding employment, and enrolling in education.
    It would therefore be appropriate that these persons are offered the possibility, and are
    encouraged, to transition into national legal statuses that better represent their actual situation
    in the Union. These could be, for example, residence permits based on employment,
    education, research, family reasons, or a national long-term resident status where applicable.
    At the same time, there might be others who do not fall under any of the existing national
    permits. There are some Member States that are creating so-called ‘omnibus’ permits that
    intend to provide the same permit to cover all those benefiting from temporary protection,
    irrespective of their individual circumstances, and having been resident in the host Member
    State at least for a certain period of time. These national statuses could offer more stability
    than the annually prolonged temporary protection.
    Information provision to encourage this transition to other statuses should also be developed
    or enhanced, as it is important for the persons enjoying temporary protection to understand the
    advantages of such statuses and their rights when transitioning to such residence permits as
    well as to be offered reassurances that there will be alternatives to applying for international
    protection.
    To support the transition of persons enjoying temporary protection to other legal statuses, and
    offering them alternative options in these exceptional circumstances, Member States should
    allow persons enjoying temporary protection, particularly where transitioning to national legal
    EN 3 EN
    statuses is not possible, and who would otherwise qualify for another status based on EU law1
    ,
    to apply for authorisations regulated under the Blue Card Directive2
    , the Single Permit
    Directive3
    and the Students and Researchers Directive4
    . This is possible provided that they
    would not concurrently hold this status with an authorisation granted under those Directives.
    Member States should inform persons enjoying temporary protection, as soon as possible and
    at the latest at the time of the application for an authorisation, of the difference between the
    rights conferred under temporary protection and under these Directives. They should also
    inform them, as soon as possible and at the latest at the time of the application, that they
    cannot concurrently benefit from temporary protection and be granted an authorisation under
    these Directives.
    Measures to pave the way for a smooth and sustainable reintegration in Ukraine
    Member States being ready for the eventual phasing out of temporary protection makes it
    essential to ensure that going back home and reintegrating in Ukraine takes place in an orderly
    and humane manner, supporting those who are willing and able to return to Ukraine, while
    taking into account their varying individual circumstances. Indeed, some may already intend
    to go back home in the short term whereas others may require more time, given their specific
    circumstances.
    Furthermore, even in a situation of peace, Ukraine will need time to rebuild its capacity to
    welcome back all those persons displaced by the war. Ukraine needs its human capital and is
    working towards ensuring the conditions to facilitate the return of Ukrainians hosted in the
    EU. It is therefore important to consider the capacity of Ukraine to reintegrate in a sustainable
    manner all those displaced by the war. To help Ukraine in its efforts, the process should be
    managed gradually, and it should take into account Ukraine’s challenges particularly to cater
    for the special needs of vulnerable persons. The Temporary Protection Directive provides
    several provisions that offer possibilities to address those types of situations.
    Article 21(1) of the Directive requires Member States to take the measures necessary to make
    possible the voluntary return of persons enjoying temporary protection or whose temporary
    protection has ended, to facilitate their return, in full respect of human dignity. In this context,
    Member States should allow for self-funded exploratory visits to Ukraine. These
    exploratory visits may work as confidence-building measures for persons enjoying temporary
    protection considering going home, helping them make informed decisions that support the
    1
    The EU legal migration Directives do not apply to third-country nationals solely on the basis that they
    are persons enjoying temporary protection in accordance with Council Directive 2001/55/EC in a
    Member State.
    2
    Directive (EU) 2021/1883 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2021 on the
    conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of highly qualified
    employment, and repealing Council Directive 2009/50/EC (OJ L 382, 28.10.2021, p. 1, ELI:
    http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2021/1883/oj).
    3
    Directive (EU) 2024/1233 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on a single
    application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory
    of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a
    Member State (OJ L, 2024/1233, 30.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1233/oj).
    4
    Directive (EU) 2016/801 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the
    conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies,
    training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing (OJ L 132,
    21.5.2016, p. 21, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/801/oj).
    EN 4 EN
    sustainability of their return to Ukraine. Exploratory visits can help them to check on family
    or property, to assess the level of destruction in their communities, and in general, the overall
    conditions in their home country.
    In the context of a smooth transition out of temporary protection, Member States should set
    up a more structured approach to promote exploratory visits. It is essential though that where
    Member States allow for exploratory visits, the parameters, conditions and requirements for
    such visits are established, coordinated with other Member States and communicated in a
    transparent manner. Member State should set up contact points for the latter purpose. It is also
    important to consider that there may be persons enjoying temporary protection who will not
    be able to organise and finance the exploratory visits by themselves, in which case, the
    Member State may consider to organise and support such exploratory visits.
    As part of the measures to make the voluntary return of persons who enjoyed temporary
    protection possible, Member States should set up voluntary return programmes. These are
    not to be considered programmes under the Return Directive, as the persons concerned legally
    reside in the host Member State until the end of temporary protection and as no return
    decision is therefore required. Instead, these are programmes that could allow for the
    sustainable, gradual and orderly returning home of those who had previously been covered by
    temporary protection in the Member State, taking into account the needs and capacity of
    Ukraine as well as of those displaced.
    Given the complexity of the situation and having regard to those who remained, including
    internally displaced persons, voluntary return programmes should be designed with a view to
    upholding social cohesion in Ukraine and therefore bringing benefits to the local community
    rather than taking the form of individualised benefit packages. For this reason, close
    coordination with the Ukrainian authorities would be fundamental when designing and
    implementing such voluntary return programmes.
    The Ukraine Investment Framework5
    will play a crucial role in preserving human capital and
    creating conditions for return. Education, housing, healthcare, care economy and social
    protection are priority sectors. Ongoing projects support the restoration of municipal
    infrastructure and help finance businesses affected by the war. New investment programmes
    accepted in March 2025 will support housing needs and future calls will include access to
    finance and jobs for vulnerable groups, including returnees. These voluntary return
    programmes should be comprehensive and well-communicated. Member States should
    establish the eligibility conditions for benefitting from such programmes. To limit risks of
    possible misuse, persons deciding for this possibility should be required to enrol in a
    voluntary return programme.
    Voluntary return programmes set up by Member States should have a limited and fixed
    duration after temporary protection has ended. It would be important to coordinate among EU
    Member States and with the Ukrainian authorities the initial duration of the voluntary return
    programmes. A duration of possibly up to one year would help the coordination with the
    Ukrainian authorities to cater for the needs of the persons concerned when they reintegrate in
    5
    The Ukraine Investment Framework (UIF) is part of the EUR 50 billion Ukraine Facility, designed to
    attract public and private investments for the recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine. It is endowed with
    financial instruments totalling EUR 9.3 billion, with EUR 7.8 billion in loan guarantees and EUR 1.5
    billion in blended finance. Its aim is to mobilise EUR 40 billion of investments for recovery,
    reconstruction, and modernisation.
    EN 5 EN
    the communities in Ukraine, such as the identification of accommodation or housing,
    employment, or access to basic services and infrastructures, including medical care.
    As the circumstances on the ground may evolve between now and the end of temporary
    protection, Member States should also coordinate among themselves and with the Ukrainian
    authorities the duration of the voluntary return programmes, and the setting out of a different
    or extended period for voluntary departure under the voluntary return programmes if the time
    foreseen is not sufficient to ensure a gradual and sustainable reintegration in Ukraine.
    Furthermore, Article 21(3) of the Directive allows for individual extensions of the Member
    States’ obligations for those who have been covered by temporary protection and are
    benefitting from a voluntary return programme. To ease the administrative burden of
    individual case-by-case extensions, Member States should extend by default all the rights
    attached to temporary protection to those enrolled in the voluntary return programme, in line
    with Article 21(3), until the date of return to Ukraine or until the end of the period for
    voluntary departure under the programme. In addition, to ensure continuity and to avoid
    situations in which the persons who benefited from temporary protection would be illegally
    staying immediately after the end of temporary protection, Member States should ensure that
    persons who benefited from temporary protection can legally reside in the territory of the
    Member State in the period between the end of temporary protection and the timeframe in
    which those persons can enrol in the voluntary return programme.
    The Directive also contains provisions for situations where persons might not be able to return
    due to specific circumstances, namely their health. Pursuant to Article 23(1) of the Directive,
    Member States shall take the necessary measures concerning the conditions of residence of
    persons who have enjoyed temporary protection and who cannot, in view of their state of
    health, reasonably be expected to travel, when, for example, they would suffer serious
    negative effects if their treatment was interrupted. This measure would provide for their
    continued legal residence and a safety net for individuals whose health or other personal
    conditions prevent them from travelling.
    Due to the effects of the war, it is possible that right at the end of temporary protection,
    Ukraine would not be in a position to cater for the needs of persons with some specific
    vulnerabilities also beyond health. Taking inspiration from Article 23(1) of the Directive,
    Member States should be encouraged to provide options for continuing the legal residence
    also for other vulnerable persons not covered by the transition to other statuses or by the
    possibility already offered by the Directive under Articles 21 and 23, whose individual
    situation might not allow for return (for example, because they have other types of
    vulnerabilities that Ukraine is unable to cater for immediately after temporary protection has
    ended). This would also contribute to a sustainable, gradual and orderly transition both for the
    persons in need and for Ukraine.
    Furthermore, under Article 23(2) of Temporary Protection Directive, Member States may
    allow families whose children are minors and attend school in a Member State to benefit from
    residence conditions allowing the children concerned to complete the ongoing school period.
    The use of this provision should be encouraged.
    Measures to ensure information provision to displaced persons
    Many of the measures outlined above require displaced persons to be properly informed to
    help them make informed choices in full knowledge of the facts. In this context, it is
    EN 6 EN
    important that Member States set up the necessary structures and procedures, including
    through information campaigns, while maximising the use of existing tools and channels to
    avoid a duplication of efforts.
    In addition, following the initiative6
    of the Ukrainian Minister of National Unity to set up
    hubs in Member States to maintain a connection with Ukrainians living abroad, some Member
    States have shown interest and are currently in the process of establishing on their territory
    Unity Hubs.
    These Unity Hubs will serve as multipurpose information centres for both integration of
    displaced people in the host societies and for going back home to Ukraine. In this context, and
    in order to streamline ongoing efforts, such Unity Hubs could also be used to provide
    information on transitioning to national statuses, exploratory visits to Ukraine and voluntary
    return programmes, to help guarantee that any decisions of displaced persons are made in full
    knowledge of the facts, in accordance with Article 21(1) of the Council Directive
    2001/55/EC.
    In order to support the setting-up of Unity Hubs, Member States may use their Asylum,
    Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) programmes, including the additional allocations
    stemming from the Multi-annual Financial Framework revision and the mid-term review of
    national programmes. They may also receive support from international organisations and
    third countries for this purpose and are encouraged to incorporate the knowledge, capacities
    and networks offered by these organisations into their individual plans for giving life to the
    Unity Hub concept.
    Measures to ensure coordination, monitoring and exchange of information among
    Member States and with the Ukrainian authorities
    It is crucial to ensure a coordinated approach among Member States and with the Ukrainian
    authorities regarding the implementation of the measures proposed. In this context, Member
    States should use existing structures to coordinate, exchange information and monitor the
    situation on the ground, including in the Solidarity Platform, which the Ukrainian authorities
    will be invited to attend, as needed.
    While Eurostat prepares the official European statistics on temporary protection, ensuring a
    timely situational picture for operational purposes requires Member States to regularly update
    their data in the Temporary Protection Registration Platform, including figures regarding
    inactive registrations. As the transition out of temporary protection will lead to significant
    changes in the status of displaced persons, it is essential to have an accurate and up-to-date
    picture of the evolving situation. Thus, Member States should regularly upload accurate and
    timely data in the Temporary Protection Registration Platform, including figures regarding
    inactive registrations.
    • Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area
    This proposal seeks to pave the way for a transition out of temporary protection in a
    coordinated manner and allowing Member States to prepare the next steps in advance, while
    providing clarity on their legal status to the persons who fled the war in Ukraine.
    6
    Regulation 2113 of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of January 2025.
    EN 7 EN
    • Consistency with other Union policies
    This proposal supports Member States in meeting the needs of those who fled the war in
    Ukraine and in assisting Ukraine in its efforts to reintegrate the persons returning home.
    2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY
    • Legal basis
    The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and in particular Article 78(1),
    Article 79(1), as well as Article 292, first and second sentence, thereof, which enables the
    Council to adopt recommendations. According to this provision, the Council shall act on a
    proposal from the Commission in all cases where the Treaties provide that it shall adopt acts
    on a proposal from the Commission.
    • Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)
    Title V of the TFEU on the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice confers certain powers on
    these matters on the European Union. These powers must be exercised in accordance with
    Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union, i.e. if and in so far as the objectives of the
    proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone and can,
    therefore, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved by the
    European Union.
    The situation in Ukraine as a result of the Russian war of aggression continues to impact the
    EU as a whole. It has been met with an unprecedented and unified response by the European
    Union. This shows that it still requires EU solutions and EU support, as well as strong
    coordination at EU level, as there is a continuous need for all Member States to effectively
    respond to the situation together and to ensure the same standards and a harmonised set of
    rights are applied across the Union for the 4.3 million people currently hosted in the Union.
    It is clear that actions taken by individual Member States cannot satisfactorily address the
    need for a common EU approach on the transition out of temporary protection, which clearly
    constitutes a challenge common to the whole of the EU, given that individual actions taken by
    one Member State will have an impact, including in terms of potential secondary movements,
    in other Member States. A common approach is needed, which cannot be sufficiently
    achieved by the Member States individually and requires the collective ownership of Member
    States and can, by reason of the scale and effects of this proposed Council Recommendation,
    be better achieved and coordinated at Union level, as also indicated by Member States
    themselves. The Union must therefore act and may adopt measures, in accordance with the
    principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5(3) of the Treaty on European Union.
    • Proportionality
    In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in Article 5(4) of the Treaty on
    the European Union, the proposed Council Recommendation provides for a coordinated
    transition out of temporary protection, in the interest of the displaced persons concerned and
    to avoid possible negative effects of divergent or inconsistent approaches taken by individual
    Member States. The proposal does not go beyond what is necessary and proportionate for
    achieving the intended objectives.
    EN 8 EN
    • Choice of the instrument
    The choice of the instrument is a Commission proposal for a Council Recommendation,
    which would allow to provide for a coordinated approach at EU level that ensure the
    collective ownership of the measures of the Member States and the necessary support of the
    EU institutions.
    3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER
    CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
    • Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation
    [n.a]
    • Stakeholder consultations
    To gather evidence-based information, the Commission regularly consulted Member State
    authorities, relevant EU Agencies, Ukrainian authorities and international organisations, while
    maintaining exchanges with non-governmental and civil society organisations.
    The Commission, in cooperation with the rotating presidencies of the Council of the European
    Union, consulted Member States on the future of temporary protection in different fora and in
    several occasions, including in the Council’s Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers
    and Asylum (SCIFA), Asylum Working Party and Working Party on Integration, Migration
    and Expulsion, in April 2024. There, Member States underlined the need to provide a
    coordinated approach at EU level on the transition out of temporary protection that would
    accompany the further prolongation of the status until March 2027 to guarantee the necessary
    time for a gradual approach, while providing clarity to displaced persons in the EU.
    In the SCIFA meeting of 10 April 2025, Member States also expressed support for the
    transition out of temporary protection to take the form of a Council Recommendation,
    covering at least the transition to other legal statuses and measures to ensure a gradual return
    to Ukraine, to guarantee collective ownership by the Member States. In parallel, the
    Commission has consulted regularly the Member States most impacted by the hosting of a
    large number of displaced persons from Ukraine on their territory.
    Complementary discussions were held in the Solidarity Platform, where Member States
    reiterated the need for a coordinated approach on the transition out of temporary protection
    that is flexible and common at European level. In parallel, the Commission held regular
    contacts with the Ukrainian authorities to better understand their needs. In addition, in
    accordance with Article 3 of the Temporary Protection Directive, the Commission specifically
    consulted the UNHCR, which has been assessing the situation and provided relevant input,
    underlying the need for a common response at EU level that would ensure providing clarity
    and proper rights and solutions to displaced persons.
    In March 2025, 109 humanitarian and civil society organisations have published a joint
    statement7
    on the situation of displaced persons from Ukraine respectively calling on the
    Commission to propose the further extension of temporary protection until March 2027, while
    offering clarity on the future of temporary protection and residence status of people displaced
    from Ukraine.
    7
    Three years since the activation of the Temporary Protection Directive: from emergency to longer-term
    solutions.
    EN 9 EN
    • Collection and use of expertise
    [n.a]
    • Impact assessment
    [n.a]
    • Regulatory fitness and simplification
    [n.a]
    • Fundamental rights
    This proposal respects fundamental rights and observes the principles in Articles 1, 7, 18, 19,
    24, 25 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as the
    obligations stemming from international law, including the Geneva Convention of 28 July
    1951 on the status of refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967.
    4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
    Since the start of the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, funding needs linked to the
    application of the Temporary Protection Directive have been accommodated within the
    budget of the existing EU funding instruments under the period 2014-2020 and 2021-2027, in
    particular under the relevant Home Affairs Funds and Cohesion Policy8
    .
    In addition, EUR 400 million were made available under the AMIF Thematic Facility and the
    Integrated Border Management Fund (BMVI) Thematic Facility for emergency assistance to
    support the Member States most affected by the mass influx of displaced persons from
    Ukraine9
    .
    In Spring 2025, the Commission announced that EUR 3 billion will be made available to
    financially support Member States until the end of 2027 for the implementation of the Pact
    and for hosting beneficiaries of temporary protection from Ukraine. Member States may also
    use allocations for which they qualified in the mid-term review of the AMIF to cover needs
    relating to temporary protection.
    5. OTHER ELEMENTS
    • Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements
    [n.a]
    • Explanatory documents (for directives)
    [n.a]
    8
    Cohesion’s Action for Refugees in Europe, the so called ‘CARE’ package (CARE, CARE-plus and
    Fast-CARE)
    9
    Emergency assistance was allocated to ten Member States (PL, CZ, RO, HU, LT, LV, EE, BG, SK and
    CY).
    EN 10 EN
    2025/0651 (NLE)
    Proposal for a
    COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
    on a coordinated approach to the transition out of temporary protection for displaced
    persons from Ukraine
    THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
    Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular
    Articles 78(1) and 79(1) and Article 292 thereof,
    Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
    Whereas:
    (1) Temporary protection for displaced persons from Ukraine who are unable to return to
    their country or region of origin because of the Russian military aggression as
    introduced by Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 and prolonged by
    Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/240910
    , (EU) 2024/183611
    and (EU)
    2025/...12
    is in place until 4 March 2027. While it remains a testament to the Union’s
    unity and solidarity with the people of Ukraine, temporary protection is by nature
    temporary. It is therefore necessary to prepare the way towards a gradual, sustainable
    and well-coordinated transition out of that status for the time when the conditions in
    Ukraine are conducive to allow temporary protection to end, while taking into account
    the capacity and reconstruction needs of Ukraine.
    (2) In the context of discussions on the future of temporary protection, Member States
    have called for such a coordinated approach at Union level. Building on the experience
    of the Member States following the activation of Council Directive 2001/55/EC, it is
    crucial to guarantee collective ownership and shared responsibility among all Member
    States at Union level throughout this process.
    (3) One of the objectives of activating Directive 2001/55/EC was to prevent Member
    States’ asylum systems becoming overwhelmed and being unable to process a large
    number of applications for international protection without adverse effects on their
    efficient operation, in the interest of the persons requesting protection. The key
    importance of this matter remains when mapping the transition out of temporary
    protection. Furthermore, even in a situation of peace, Ukraine will need time to rebuild
    its capacity to be able to welcome back all those persons displaced by the war. In order
    to support Ukraine in its efforts to reintegrate the displaced persons, it is therefore
    10
    Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/2409 of 19 October 2023 extending temporary protection as
    introduced by Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 (OJ L, 2023/2409, 24.10.2023, ELI:
    http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2023/2409/oj).
    11
    Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/1836 of 25 June 2024 extending temporary protection as
    introduced by Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 (OJ L, 2024/1836, 3.7.2024, ELI:
    http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2024/1836/oj).
    12
    Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/… of … extending temporary protection as introduced by
    Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 (OJ L, .., ELI: …).
    EN 11 EN
    important that the process is managed flexibly, gradually and considering the
    individual situations of the persons concerned. This transition should therefore cater
    for the needs of those currently benefitting from temporary protection and the needs of
    Ukraine, while preserving the integrity of the Member States’ asylum systems.
    (4) Many displaced persons who have benefitted from temporary protection have now
    been in the Union for several years, and they have integrated into their host societies
    by learning the language, finding employment, and enrolling in education. It is
    therefore appropriate that they are offered the possibility to transition into national
    legal statuses that better represent their actual situation in the Union already now,
    where the conditions for continuing legal residence on other grounds are met. These
    could be, for example, residence permits based on employment, education, research or
    family reasons. Member States should therefore promote and facilitate this transition
    including by providing clear information to help persons concerned understand the
    advantages and rights conferred by these residence permits, in comparison to
    temporary protection and international protection.
    (5) In view of supporting the transition of persons enjoying temporary protection to other
    legal statuses and of offering them alternative options in these exceptional
    circumstances, Member States should allow persons enjoying temporary protection,
    particularly where access to national statuses may not be possible, and who would
    otherwise qualify for another status based on EU law, to apply for authorisations
    regulated under the Directives (EU) 2016/80113
    , (EU) 2021/188314
    and (EU)
    2024/123315
    of the European Parliament and of the Council. This is possible provided
    that they would not concurrently hold their temporary protection status and an
    authorisation granted under those Directives. Consequently, Member States should
    inform persons enjoying temporary protection, as soon as possible and at the latest at
    the time of the application for an authorisation, of the difference between the rights
    conferred under the temporary protection status and under those Directives. They
    should also inform them, as soon as possible and at the latest at the time of the
    application, that they cannot concurrently benefit from temporary protection and be
    granted an authorisation under these Directives.
    (6) For Member States to be ready for the eventual phasing out of temporary protection, it
    is essential to ensure that going back home and reintegrating in Ukraine takes place in
    an orderly and humane manner, and considers the varying individual circumstances of
    displaced persons, supporting those who are willing and able to return to Ukraine.
    While some persons may already intend to go back home in the short term, others may
    require more time, given their specific circumstances. It is also important to consider
    the capacity of Ukraine to reintegrate in a sustainable manner all those displaced by
    13
    Directive (EU) 2016/801 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the
    conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of research, studies,
    training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing (OJ L 132,
    21.5.2016, p. 21, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/801/oj).
    14
    Directive (EU) 2021/1883 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2021 on the
    conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of highly qualified
    employment, and repealing Council Directive 2009/50/EC (OJ L 382, 28.10.2021, p. 1, ELI:
    http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2021/1883/oj).
    15
    Directive (EU) 2024/1233 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on a single
    application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory
    of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a
    Member State (OJ L, 2024/1233, 30.4.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1233/oj).
    EN 12 EN
    the war. Therefore, Member States should adopt measures that pave the way for a
    smooth and sustainable reintegration in Ukraine, taking all these considerations into
    account, by making full use and expanding the tools already provided for in Articles
    21 and 23 of Council Directive 2001/55/EC.
    (7) Those considering going back home to Ukraine should be able to make informed
    decisions, which would also support the sustainability of their return. In the context of
    a smooth transition out of temporary protection, Member States should set up a more
    structured approach to promote self-funded exploratory visits, as provided for in
    Article 21(1) of Directive 2001/55/EC. These visits could serve as confidence-building
    measure for persons enjoying temporary protection as it would allow them to check on
    family or property, or assess the level of destruction in their communities, and in
    general the overall conditions in Ukraine. To increase the effectiveness of these visits
    and to prevent abuses, Member State should set up the parameters, conditions and
    requirements for such visits. Any such requirements should be coordinated with other
    Member States and established and communicated in a transparent manner. For the
    latter purpose, Member States should set up contact points. It is important to consider
    that there might be persons who will not able to carry out exploratory visits by
    themselves. Member States may consider in such cases organising and supporting such
    exploratory visits.
    (8) Member States are required to take the measures necessary to make the voluntary
    return of persons whose temporary protection has ended possible. For this purpose,
    Member States should set up voluntary return programmes. To ensure their
    effectiveness and avoid risks of misuse, these programmes should be carefully
    designed, comprehensive and well communicated, taking into account the needs and
    capacity of Ukraine, as well as the need of displaced persons within the Union and the
    situation of those who remained in Ukraine in order to uphold social cohesion. For this
    reason, any such programme should prioritise support for reintegration in the
    communities, for which Union funding will be available in Ukraine, instead of
    individual packages. The conditions for eligibility for such programmes should be
    clearly established, and the persons who intend to benefit from them be required to
    enrol. Member States could consider, as part of those programmes, to assist in the
    organisation of departures, for example where large numbers of displaced persons are
    returning to the same area in Ukraine.
    (9) While such voluntary return programmes should be of limited and fixed duration, they
    should allow for sufficient time to ensure appropriate coordination with the Ukrainian
    authorities with a view to facilitating the gradual and adequate integration of returning
    persons in their communities, including access to basic services and facilities, such as
    accommodation, housing or medical care. For this reason, and to ensure the initial
    duration of the voluntary return programme is coordinated with all Member States and
    the Ukrainian authorities, voluntary return programmes should provide for a period of
    departure that allows these objectives to be attained, namely a period of possibly up to
    one year. During this period, persons should be allowed to continue legally residing in
    the Member State. As the circumstances on the ground may evolve between now and
    the end of temporary protection, if the time foreseen is not sufficient to ensure a
    gradual and sustainable reintegration in Ukraine, Member State should coordinate
    among themselves and with the Ukrainian authorities to set out a different or extended
    period for voluntary departure under the voluntary return programmes.
    (10) To reduce administrative burdens related to possible individual case-by-case issuance
    of residence permits to those enrolled in voluntary return programmes, Member States
    EN 13 EN
    should use the possibility provided for under Article 21(3) of Directive 2001/55/EC to
    allow persons who enjoyed temporary protection and benefit from a voluntary return
    programme to extend the rights attached to temporary protection laid down in Chapter
    III of Directive 2001/55/EC to those persons who have enjoyed temporary protection
    beyond the duration of temporary protection until the return date to Ukraine or the end
    of the period for voluntary departures under the voluntary return programme. In
    addition, to ensure continuity and avoid situations in which the persons will be
    illegally staying immediately after the end of temporary protection, Member States
    should ensure that persons who benefitted from temporary protection can legally
    reside in the territory of the Member State in the period between the end of temporary
    protection and the timeframe in which persons can enrol in the voluntary return
    programme.
    (11) It is possible that right at the end of temporary protection, Ukraine would not be in a
    position to cater for the needs of persons with some specific vulnerabilities also
    beyond health. To ensure a sustainable return home that takes account of the capacity
    of Ukraine to cater for the needs of specific groups, Member States should also apply
    Article 23(1) of Directive 2001/55/EC to persons subject to vulnerabilities other than
    those related to health conditions and take the necessary measures concerning
    conditions for continuing their legal residence. Where relevant, Member States should
    ensure that the conditions of residence take into account the special needs of the
    persons concerned.
    (12) Member States should use the possibilities provided for under Article 23(2) of
    Directive 2001/55/EC to allow persons to reside on their territory beyond the duration
    of temporary protection, namely for families whose children are minors and attend
    school in a Member State.
    (13) To guarantee proper information provision and help persons enjoying temporary
    protection to make informed choices in full knowledge of the facts, it is important to
    maximise the use of the existing tools and channels and to avoid a duplication of
    efforts. For this purpose, where Unity Hubs are set up in Member States, they should
    be used to provide information on transition to other legal statuses, exploratory visits
    and voluntary return programmes. In order to support the Unity Hubs, Member States
    may use the funds under Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund established under
    Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 of the European Parliament and of the Council16
    ,
    including the additional allocations stemming from the Multi-annual Financial
    Framework mid-term revision and the mid-term review of the Member States’
    programmes under the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund. Support from internal
    organisations and third countries could be also received for this purpose. In order to
    streamline the efforts, Member States should incorporate the knowledge, capacities
    and networks offered by international organisations into their individual plans to set up
    the Unity Hubs.
    (14) To ensure a coordinated approach among Member States and with the Ukrainian
    authorities regarding the implementation of this Recommendation, Member States
    should coordinate, exchange information and monitor the situation on the ground in
    16
    Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing
    the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (OJ L 251, 15.7.2021, p. 1, ELI:
    http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1147/oj).
    EN 14 EN
    various relevant fora, including in the Solidarity Platform to which the Ukrainian
    authorities will be invited, as needed.
    (15) As the transition out of temporary protection will lead to significant changes in the
    status of displaced persons, it is essential to have an accurate picture of the evolving
    situation. Member States should therefore regularly and timely update their temporary
    protection data in the Temporary Protection Registration Platform, including figures
    regarding inactive registrations.
    (16) [In accordance with Article 3 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United
    Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed
    to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
    Union, Ireland has notified [, by letter of …,] its wish to take part in the adoption and
    application of this Recommendation.]
    OR
    [In accordance with Articles 1, 2 of Protocol No 21 on the position of the United
    Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed
    to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
    Union, and without prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, Ireland is not taking part in
    the adoption of this [act] and is not bound by it or subject to its application.]
    (17) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark,
    annexed to the Treaty on the European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of
    the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this
    Recommendation and is not subject to its application,
    HEREBY RECOMMENDS:
    Measures to promote the transition into other legal statuses already before the end of
    temporary protection
    1. Member States should promote and facilitate the access to national legal statuses for
    persons enjoying temporary protection who are engaged in employment, self-
    employment, professional training or education and research in a Member State or
    who would qualify for national legal statuses due to family or other reasons, and who
    would meet the conditions set out in national law.
    2. Member States should allow persons enjoying temporary protection, particularly
    where access to national legal statuses is not possible, and who would otherwise
    qualify for another status based on EU law, to apply for authorisations regulated
    under the Directives (EU) 2016/801, (EU) 2021/1883 and (EU) 2024/1233, provided
    that they would not concurrently hold this status with an authorisation granted under
    those Directives. Member States should inform persons enjoying temporary
    protection, as soon as possible and at the latest at the time of the application for an
    authorisation, of the difference between the rights conferred under the temporary
    protection status and under those Directives. They should also inform them, as soon
    as possible and at the latest at the time of the application, that they cannot
    concurrently benefit from temporary protection and be granted an authorisation
    under these Directives.
    Measures to pave the way for a smooth and sustainable reintegration in Ukraine
    3. Member States should allow for exploratory visits on a self-funded basis to Ukraine
    in accordance with Article 21(1) of Directive 2001/55/EC. In this context, Member
    States should:
    EN 15 EN
    (a) set up and coordinate with the other Member States the parameters or
    conditions for exploratory visits.
    (b) inform persons who may want to carry out such visits about the parameters or
    conditions. Contact points should be set up for that purpose.
    (c) consider, in cases where the persons concerned will not be able to organise and
    fund the exploratory visit by themselves, organising and supporting such
    exploratory visits.
    4. Establish a voluntary return programmes in accordance with Article 21(1) of Council
    Directive 2001/55/EC to be used once temporary protection has ended. In this
    context, Member States should:
    (a) ensure coordination with the Ukrainian authorities to facilitate reintegration in
    the communities in Ukraine, such as the identification of accommodation or
    housing, or access to basic services and infrastructures, including medical care.
    (b) ensure that support under voluntary return programmes prioritises support for
    reintegration into communities in Ukraine, instead of individual packages.
    (c) set up the eligibility conditions for benefitting from the voluntary return
    programme.
    (d) require those persons who want to benefit from the voluntary return
    programme to enrol in such a programme to be able to benefit from it.
    (e) set up a concrete period of possibly up to one year after temporary protection
    has ended for voluntary departure under the programme. Coordinate with the
    other Member States and Ukrainian authorities, and in accordance with point 8,
    where, in view of the developments on the ground, a different or extended
    period for voluntary departure would be needed under the programme, if the
    time foreseen is not sufficient to ensure the gradual and sustainable
    reintegration of persons in Ukraine;
    (f) use the possibility under Article 21(3) of Directive 2001/55/EC to extend the
    rights attached to temporary protection laid down in Chapter III of Directive
    2001/555 to those persons who have enjoyed temporary protection and are
    benefitting from a voluntary return programme until the date of return to
    Ukraine or until the end of the period for voluntary departure under the
    programme. Ensure the continuation of legal residence between the date when
    temporary protection ends and the period in which the person can enrol in that
    programme;
    (g) consider the possibility of assisting with the organisation of departures,
    particularly where large groups of displaced persons return to the same area in
    Ukraine.
    5. With due respect for human dignity, Member States should take the necessary
    measures concerning the conditions of residence of persons not meeting the
    requirements to access other statuses and having vulnerabilities other than those
    covered under Article 23(1) of Directive 2001/55/EC until it is possible for Ukraine
    to provide for the special needs of such persons. Where relevant, Member States
    should ensure that the conditions of residence take into account their special needs.
    6. Member States should, in accordance with Article 23(2) of Directive 2001/55/EC,
    allow families whose children are minors and attend school in a Member State to
    EN 16 EN
    benefit from residence conditions allowing the children concerned to complete the
    current school period where the date of the end of temporary protection established
    by the Council Decision taken in accordance with Article 6 of Council Directive
    2001/55/EC is not aligned with the end of the school year.
    Measures to ensure information provision to displaced persons
    7. Member States should ensure that displaced persons are properly informed regarding
    the possibilities to transition to other legal statuses, including the advantages and
    rights when transitioning to these statuses, as well as about the situation in Ukraine,
    the requirements for exploratory visits and the support for going back home available
    in the Union and in Ukraine. In this regard, Member States should:
    (a) set up swift national communication systems and procedures, such as contact
    points, or an information campaign;
    (b) for those Member States intending to set up a Unity Hub on their territory in
    collaboration with the Ukrainian authorities, make use of these Unity Hubs to
    provide the relevant information to displaced persons. Incorporate the
    knowledge, capacities and networks offered by international organisations into
    the national plan to set up Unity Hubs.
    (c) consider making use of the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund
    programme, including the additional allocations stemming from the Multi-
    annual Financial Framework revision and the mid-term review of national
    programmes, to support the Unity Hubs.
    Measures to ensure coordination, monitoring and exchange of information among
    Member States and with the Ukrainian authorities
    8. Member States should coordinate and exchange information on relevant
    developments as well on the implementation of this Recommendation among
    Member States and with the Ukrainian authorities, including within the framework of
    the Solidarity Platform to which the Ukrainian authorities will be invited, as needed.
    9. Member States should monitor the developments and update timely and regularly the
    relevant information regarding the status of displaced persons in the relevant
    databases, including in the Temporary Protection Registration Platform, in particular
    regarding the number of beneficiaries of temporary protection or of adequate
    protection under national law in the Member State territory, number of persons who
    transitioned to other statuses and no longer benefit from temporary protection or
    adequate protection under national law, and number of persons, whose registrations
    are inactive.
    Done at Brussels,
    For the Council
    The President